Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Predictors - Computers: Mead & Drasgaw

Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil tests

6 comments:

  1. •Another factor that could diminish the performance ability of test applicants is the screen display size vs. being able to read and go back to your reading much easier on a paper-&-pencil test. Also, I recall a study finding reading to be slower on computer screens vs. paper/books.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would like to see this same study done with a SJT because they were talking about the small differences between coloring in a bubble versus pressing a button. I would expect test that require longer answers to show a bigger difference in the medium used. Sometimes people might not fully complete an answer because they are tired from writing. What about typing or using a Dragon Dictation for tests that require essay type answers?

    ReplyDelete
  3. What types of constructs might be more affected by changing a mode of administration? Can you think of any speeded tests that a company might want to use for a position as a selection tool?

    ReplyDelete
  4. How does everyone feel about speeded tests? Do you think they are useful when how fast someone performs is not incredibly important? I understand not wanting to hiring employees that are extremely slow at tasks but don't see the point when most applicants will finish within a few minutes of each other.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What are the different kinds of reasoning or intelligence that these two kinds of tests (power and speeded tests) are assessing?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wonder if the correlation between computer-based and p&p tests would be higher if p&p test takers were allowed to mark the correct answer for each question on the test itself instead of having to mark a scantron sheet?

    ReplyDelete

Followers